Connect with us


Exclusive: Apple’s giving up ground in its App Store fight with Dutch regulators and Tinder



Apple’s giving up ground in its App Store fight with Dutch regulators and Tinder

#Apples #giving #ground #App #Store #fight #Dutch #regulators #Tinder

Apple announced on Friday that it’s once again updated its rules about how Dutch dating apps can use third-party payment systems, after the company had “productive conversations with the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM).” The updated rules give developers more flexibility about which payment systems they use, change the language users see when they go to pay, and remove other restrictions that the previous rules put in place.

While the rules aren’t wide-reaching (again, they only apply to Dutch dating apps), they do show what Apple’s willing to do to comply with government regulation — which it could be facing a lot more of as the EU and US gear up to fight tech monopolies, and potentially even force the company to ditch the iPhone’s Lightning port.

In December the ACM announced a ruling that Apple had to let dating apps use payment services besides the one built into iOS, after the regulator received a complaint from Match Group, the company behind dating services like Tinder,, and OkCupid. Since then, Apple has proposed a variety of solutions for complying with the order, which the regulator has said aren’t good enough. In May, the ACM said that Apple’s most recent rules, the ones prior to the Friday update, were improvements over its past ideas, but that they still didn’t comply with Dutch and European laws.

There’s been increasing pressure for Apple to comply: even while the company works on changes, it’s been racking up tens of millions of Euros in fines.

The changes Apple announced on Friday are a significant update to its previous proposal, which it published in March. The rules still make developers show users a message before they’re shown the third-party payment screen, which can be either in the app, or on an external website, but Apple’s new proposed language is less likely to scare potential customers off in my opinion.

Originally, the proposed language read:

This app doesn’t support the App Store’s payment system.

All purchases in this app will be managed by the developer “<Developer Name>.” You will no longer be transacting with Apple. Your stored App Store payment method and related features, such as subscription management and refund requests, will not be available. Apple is not responsible for the privacy or security of transactions made with this developer.

Now, it reads:

Your payment will be managed by the developer. You will no longer be transacting with Apple.

All purchases in this app will be processed by a service provider selected by the developer “developerName”. The developer will be responsible for the payment methods and related features such as subscriptions and refunds. App Store features, such as your stored App Store payment method, subscription management, and refund requests, will not be available.


The options users will see on the prompt are also different. Before, they would see buttons to “Continue” or “Cancel.” Those have been replaced with a button that says “I Understand.” The messages users will see if the developer links them out of the app (to a third-party payment site) have also gotten rewrites in the same vein.

Under Apple’s new rules, developers also won’t have to choose between a third-party in-app payment or an external payment link; they can use both if they want, which wasn’t previously the case. They’ll also be able to show how much something will cost — Apple’s removed a rule saying that a link to an external payment couldn’t include “the price of items available on the website you own or have responsibility for.”

The old rules, which you can read from this web archive here, had specific requirements for third-party payment processors if a developer wanted to use their services in their app. Before Friday’s changes, developers would have to find a processor that supported things like:

  • “Payment method offering and diversity (support for credit cards, debit cards, etc.)”
  • Value-added services such as transaction tax management and handling
  • Payment security and privacy policies that “exceed Level 1 Payment Card Industry compliance”

The rules also dictated how reliable the payment processor had to be, saying that it had to have 99.9 percent availability and respond to requests within 300 milliseconds. Apple still has some requirements for third-party payment processors, but they appear to be significantly broader — now they’re things like “meets Level 1 Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance for handling credit and debit card data” and “denominates all prices for the sale of digital goods and services to users in the Netherlands in the euro currency.”

Apple also says it’s updated the third-party payments commission structure. The previous rules made it seem like Dutch dating app devs would have to pay a 27 percent commission on third-party transactions no matter what. While that’s a three percent discount from Apple’s standard 30 percent cut on in-app purchases, having to pay 27 percent would be a significant increase from the 15 percent that developers in the App Store Small Business Program pay, or from the 15 percent that developers pay out of their recurring subscription revenue after users have maintained their subscription for a year.

Now, Apple says that it’s offering a three percent discount when you go through a third-party payment processor, period — if you would’ve paid Apple 30 percent, you’ll now pay it 27, and if you would’ve paid 15 percent, you’ll pay 12. While such a small discount is still a clear message from Apple that developers just shouldn’t bother looking elsewhere (especially given the extra work involved, and the fact that third-party payment systems will have their own fees), the change at least means that smaller developers won’t be paying the iPhone maker a higher percentage if they choose to go third-party.

The ACM doesn’t seem to have taken issue with Apple’s commission structure in its previous rebuttals of the company’s proposals.

In its Friday news post, Apple makes it clear that it’s not particularly happy about the situation it’s in. “Because Apple is committed to constructive engagement with regulators, we’re making the additional changes at the ACM’s request,” the company says, but also that it doesn’t believe some of the changes “are in the best interests of our users’ privacy or data security.” The company also reiterates that it disagrees with the original order and is appealing it.


Exclusive: As avatars for metaverse applications grow in popularity, a look at Understanding Comics, a 30-year-old illustrated lecture considered an avatar design bible (Tim Bradshaw/Financial Times) –




As avatars for metaverse applications grow in popularity, a look at Understanding Comics, a 30-year-old illustrated lecture considered an avatar design bible (Tim Bradshaw/Financial Times)

#avatars #metaverse #applications #grow #popularity #Understanding #Comics #30yearold #illustrated #lecture #considered #avatar #design #bible #Tim #BradshawFinancial #Times

Tim Bradshaw / Financial Times:

As avatars for metaverse applications grow in popularity, a look at Understanding Comics, a 30-year-old illustrated lecture considered an avatar design bible  —  First published 30 years ago, Scott McCloud’s Understanding Comics is the definitive comic book about comic books.

Continue Reading


Exclusive: Kaspersky report highlights common ransomware attack patterns –




Kaspersky report highlights common ransomware attack patterns

#Kaspersky #report #highlights #common #ransomware #attack #patterns

Why it matters: As ransomware remains a prevalent security threat, an essential step in countering attackers is identifying their methods. Security researchers found that several of the most prolific groups share a significant proportion of their tactics, potentially making them more predictable.

A new report from security company Kaspersky reveals that eight of the most active ransomware gangs operate with very similar patterns. Analysis, digital forensics specialists, and other security workers could use these similarities to identify and fight these attackers more efficiently.

The report analyzes the tactics, techniques, and procedures of (TTP) of the ransomware groups Conti/Ryuk, Pysa, Clop (TA505), Hive, Lockbit 2.0, RagnarLocker, BlackByte, and BlackCat. VentureBeat notes that these eight gangs have attacked over 500 organizations in various industries in the US, the UK, and Germany in the last year. Kaspersky built an interesting chart listing dozens of steps in ransomware attacks and indicating which attackers undergo each step. None of them are unique to one group.

For instance, all the groups like to start by attacking external remote services, while only half also open with phishing. All the gangs tend to favor targets like Windows Management Instrumentation, command and scripting interpreters, application layer protocols, web protocols, signed binary execution, and others.

Common steps like preventing system recovery or encrypting the most impactful data seem obvious. However, some of the least prevalent tactics involve BITS jobs, lifting account credentials from password stores, or getting them from web browsers.

Early in June, a Foxconn facility in Mexico suffered an attack from Lockbit 2.0. Other recent ransomware victims include QNAP, Asustor, and Nvidia.


Continue Reading


Exclusive: 'Cryptoqueen' Lands a Spot On the FBI's Most Wanted List –




'Cryptoqueen' Lands a Spot On the FBI's Most Wanted List

#039Cryptoqueen039 #Lands #Spot #FBI039s #Wanted #List

Ruja Ignatova standing with a microphone to her lips.

Ruja Ignatova, the once-founder of OneCoin, is now on the FBI’s top 10 most wanted.
Screenshot: FBI Video

Ruja Ignatova, who in the past dubbed herself the “Cryptoqueen,” is now sitting with a fancy crown in a new royal court: the FBI’s top 10 most wanted.

FBI officials and federal prosecutors announced Ignatova’s new designation in a press conference Thursday. Ignatova was charged in 2019 with wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering for her part in the OneCoin crypto company that prosecutors alleged was just a ponzi scheme.

Michael Driscoll, the FBI’s assistant director-in-charge for New York declined to answer Reuters’ questions whether they had any leads, but said Ignatova “left with a tremendous amount of cash,” adding, “money can buy a lot of friends.”

Ignatova was part of a Bulgaria-based crypto company called OneCoin. The company claimed they were performing a regular crypto mining operation—generating new tokens added to a blockchainand pumped out $3.78 billion in revenue from the end of 2014 to the middle of 2016. But despite the upward momentum, investigators from the U.S. Department of Justice reported that OneCoin’s value was rigged internally, that the coins were essentially worthless, and users could not even trace ownership of the coins. The DOJ alleged those at the head of the company made nearly $2.5 billion in profit that they squirreled away in company bank accounts.

Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, told reporters Ignatova capitalized “on the frenzied speculation of the early days of cryptocurrency.”

In an FBI-provided video of Ignatova speaking at a London company event dated June, 2016, Ignatova boasted about her two million active users, adding “no other cryptocurrency has as many users as we do,”


Bloomberg reported that after Ignatov grew suspicious that the feds were onto her, she fled to Greece and then investigators lost track of her.

In 2019, the U.S. unsealed an indictment against Ignatov, charging her with the previously mentioned litany of financial crimes. That same year, Konstantin Ignatova, one of OneCoin’s founders and Ruja’s brother, was charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Konstantin managed to get a plea deal, and though his sentencing was set for May 13, his attorneys adjourned the date for 90 days so he could further cooperate with authorities.

The Cryptoqueen has evaded police custody and remains at large to this day. So, the FBI says it’ll pay up to a $100,000 reward for any info that leads to an arrest.

In addition, U.S. prosecutors previously convicted former corporate lawyer Mark Scott of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to commit bank fraud for laundering around $400 million for the company. Ruja Ignatov testified against Scott at his trial. Scott is contesting his guilty verdict by claiming Ruja lied on the stand, according to Bloomberg.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2022 Talk Of News.